Hello everyone, for this post I had some delays, but if you have patience, I always return! Today we finish the conversation we had undertaken over the last two posts and that is the theme of communication in public, also called "Public Speaking" on the Anglo-Saxon mania that now accompanies every field of study and beyond. But let's start! Today
try to focus on some variables that the good orator should keep under review the eve of the speech and during its course. I will also try to make you understand how important an adequate test of the technological equipment of support and sufficient familiarity with the environment in which it is held. We then analyze the problems related to the content of the speech and the relationship with the audience, to learn to go beyond mere entertainment and ensure that their intervention can effectively achieve the listeners. If the room is equipped with tools for audio and video communication (microphones, amplifiers, projectors, etc..) Can create many inconveniences that might ruin the performance. The room should be visited at least a few minutes before you begin, the tools are tested and placed. The machines are useful and effective, but they work well and you know how to use. In public speaking emotions, personal experiences, involvement, are important to give the audience something credible and useful. You, as a good actor, you must talk to everyone to reach everyone. You will have to try again and again, until you will not be lowered fear of Judgement, and you will have gained sufficient security. Behind the scenes, somewhere where you can feel comfortable, organize your own space. It will be the place where you can relax before going on stage. Just a chair. Sit more comfortably as possible, relaxes the body, close your eyes and make a few deep breaths to relax. And 'normal to feel a bit' anxiety before speaking in public, but the right amount of tension helps to give the best. Now it's up to you! Sitting or standing in front of a lot or little people, strangers, colleagues, students. Really matters very little. The excitement of the beginning, the first contact, is always strong, even after years of experience. Take your time as you want, but never start with the breath in my throat. You have to organize well the first words we speak, you can also learn them by heart, this is a secret to break the ice, the rest will follow. And if you happen to be facing a technical subject in itself dry, uninvolving? No doubt you have recourse to the media, plans to make as much as possible to understand the issue you're dealing with. But in terms of communication does not change anything: you will still attract the audience and be able to implicate him. Albert Einstein was talking about physics, atoms, formulas, drawing on the chalkboard, but not in the room flew a fly! Be careful of putting too much passion in his speech: If you are unable to contain the emotional pressure that makes you want to give too much, your generosity minutes will take you off topic. You will begin to take too many side streets, to branch out too much talk, or to carry out in concentric circles, stray too far from the core. The risk of three ways to do this is to lose the street and linger over time. The joke is a compelling factor, but if you overdo it, releasing the tension in a series of laughs and gags, you'll get a comic effect to discredit you as a speaker. The comedy has to be calibrated by focusing on a smile, and then return to professionalism. Draw too much public speaking television models (the dialectic of the conductors of TV game show, man show, variety show, etc..) Leads to build a form, a comic stereotype unsuitable for most applications to public relations. The public works with you. If you can soak in your communication flow, it will create a sort of complicity by silence on "active". This is an unequivocal silence, where you are communicating something very important. The public now can recognize a good speaker, from the start. You should not try to convince him to be prepared, do not act to deceive: you get to the public only because you know what you say and how you're saying. Why are you focused and happy with you. The public tends to identify with the speaker, and that's why you should be able to offer your best part (of both man that an expert). Telling personal experiences is the best way to bring the level of practice, "to do", even the most difficult content. Personal experience wins out over technicalities, the most sought after languages, because it acts on the personal experiences of the public. Engaging? You do not have to go all out. You must remain at the level of freedom of thought and the absence of manipulative intent. It is not a good way to "build" the involvement, for even if, apparently, consensus is achieved, you will not have acted in the direction of learning. The purpose of public speaking is to get to people, not content with having entertained. Always think like you can do to build direct examples. Use objects, bring creativity and innovation to find the key to a personalized communication, visual. There are no limits except those you impose the fear of opinion, but if it does not address the risk of new, experimenting, you'll be on the borderline between the rapporteur and the mediocre magician with the magic hat. The public speaking must take account of management capacity of a debate. You'll turn to the role of moderator in a speaker, and having to: store the requests for assistance not to upset anyone; prevent someone become a personal question in a box and decide whether to respond immediately or raise questions and to meet the demands end; deal with the time not to leave open questions and doubts. These are just some of the suggestions more "famous", all the rest is experience as always! Do not be afraid to communicate, remember that this is the only way to success! Coming soon to change the subject (now I will not say more next Wednesday :-) Hello to all you next time.
try to focus on some variables that the good orator should keep under review the eve of the speech and during its course. I will also try to make you understand how important an adequate test of the technological equipment of support and sufficient familiarity with the environment in which it is held. We then analyze the problems related to the content of the speech and the relationship with the audience, to learn to go beyond mere entertainment and ensure that their intervention can effectively achieve the listeners. If the room is equipped with tools for audio and video communication (microphones, amplifiers, projectors, etc..) Can create many inconveniences that might ruin the performance. The room should be visited at least a few minutes before you begin, the tools are tested and placed. The machines are useful and effective, but they work well and you know how to use. In public speaking emotions, personal experiences, involvement, are important to give the audience something credible and useful. You, as a good actor, you must talk to everyone to reach everyone. You will have to try again and again, until you will not be lowered fear of Judgement, and you will have gained sufficient security. Behind the scenes, somewhere where you can feel comfortable, organize your own space. It will be the place where you can relax before going on stage. Just a chair. Sit more comfortably as possible, relaxes the body, close your eyes and make a few deep breaths to relax. And 'normal to feel a bit' anxiety before speaking in public, but the right amount of tension helps to give the best. Now it's up to you! Sitting or standing in front of a lot or little people, strangers, colleagues, students. Really matters very little. The excitement of the beginning, the first contact, is always strong, even after years of experience. Take your time as you want, but never start with the breath in my throat. You have to organize well the first words we speak, you can also learn them by heart, this is a secret to break the ice, the rest will follow. And if you happen to be facing a technical subject in itself dry, uninvolving? No doubt you have recourse to the media, plans to make as much as possible to understand the issue you're dealing with. But in terms of communication does not change anything: you will still attract the audience and be able to implicate him. Albert Einstein was talking about physics, atoms, formulas, drawing on the chalkboard, but not in the room flew a fly! Be careful of putting too much passion in his speech: If you are unable to contain the emotional pressure that makes you want to give too much, your generosity minutes will take you off topic. You will begin to take too many side streets, to branch out too much talk, or to carry out in concentric circles, stray too far from the core. The risk of three ways to do this is to lose the street and linger over time. The joke is a compelling factor, but if you overdo it, releasing the tension in a series of laughs and gags, you'll get a comic effect to discredit you as a speaker. The comedy has to be calibrated by focusing on a smile, and then return to professionalism. Draw too much public speaking television models (the dialectic of the conductors of TV game show, man show, variety show, etc..) Leads to build a form, a comic stereotype unsuitable for most applications to public relations. The public works with you. If you can soak in your communication flow, it will create a sort of complicity by silence on "active". This is an unequivocal silence, where you are communicating something very important. The public now can recognize a good speaker, from the start. You should not try to convince him to be prepared, do not act to deceive: you get to the public only because you know what you say and how you're saying. Why are you focused and happy with you. The public tends to identify with the speaker, and that's why you should be able to offer your best part (of both man that an expert). Telling personal experiences is the best way to bring the level of practice, "to do", even the most difficult content. Personal experience wins out over technicalities, the most sought after languages, because it acts on the personal experiences of the public. Engaging? You do not have to go all out. You must remain at the level of freedom of thought and the absence of manipulative intent. It is not a good way to "build" the involvement, for even if, apparently, consensus is achieved, you will not have acted in the direction of learning. The purpose of public speaking is to get to people, not content with having entertained. Always think like you can do to build direct examples. Use objects, bring creativity and innovation to find the key to a personalized communication, visual. There are no limits except those you impose the fear of opinion, but if it does not address the risk of new, experimenting, you'll be on the borderline between the rapporteur and the mediocre magician with the magic hat. The public speaking must take account of management capacity of a debate. You'll turn to the role of moderator in a speaker, and having to: store the requests for assistance not to upset anyone; prevent someone become a personal question in a box and decide whether to respond immediately or raise questions and to meet the demands end; deal with the time not to leave open questions and doubts. These are just some of the suggestions more "famous", all the rest is experience as always! Do not be afraid to communicate, remember that this is the only way to success! Coming soon to change the subject (now I will not say more next Wednesday :-) Hello to all you next time.