E 'already in itself a contradiction in terms find us here talking about adding to the provincial elections in short, on the one hand, we "extended" trying to add things / people / states that have little in common (see Turkey and the EU) and the other remain the usual, italianotti , precisely, "provincial."
I would have the opportunity to make a few notes from the critics who have indulged with their assumptions, and then we start:
- Rating ideological no longer exists': Today we vote on the programs. False. If so the turnout would be far more 'extensive than that recorded. Or at least we would have a millimeter balance, given the usual language used in campaign. No new theme, no outlet channel. Usual meals to swallow 'fatigue. Rating perhaps ideological left has disappeared: where people reasoned, in my opinion, even before the elections voted in a certain way to pluralism, the pressures from below, the attention to the weak, historical themes of the left. This time, for a while, these issues were, so to speak, shamefully neglected by the left and left Italian politicians, who decided not to vote / rate of stone / get thrown in by Bossi. Instead it seems to me that the voting right ideological hard again, the success of the European Right is not explained in altro modo. Il successo della destra italiana, se può essere in parte attribuibile alla nostra situazione mediatica di "paese mediamente libero", è anche certamente frutto di uno zoccolo duro conservatore in società e liberista - fregastato in economia che vede in Berlusconi il suo idillio, e nel celodurismo di Bossi la sua realizzazione massima.
- La destra perde perchè paga l'astensione. Falso. Come facevano i commentatori delle TV di regime italiane a sapere, fin da domenica sera, senza sondaggi e senza ricerca, che le persone che non sono andate a votare avrebbero in realtà votato a destra ? Sulla base di quale precedente, di quale ragionamento già da un bel pò of elections shall develop these theories? voter satisfied with his right hand does not see why not to vote (the more so because it was in many cases, provincial and european domination of reversing a center-left). Those who remained at home, I suppose are people who did not know which of the four sickles hammer and put the cross, those who have not as yet unclear role Franceschini, or those who voted in yesterday and left until you are seen allocate billions for wars, banks, the Vatican, and any number of pardons. Take a little math ...
- Rating worker has moved to the Northern League. partly true. for intellectual honesty, we must admit two things: first, that the vote is no longer working class 'that long ago, mass because the mass is no more'. Unemployment, computerization and outsourcing have made the hard worker and pure in his dusty suit a thing of the past century (at least in terms of the collective imagination). The second is that the worker dusty above is not over 'band more' impoverished and disadvantaged populations. It was largely replaced by people coming from far away, young and ugly tan that everyone calls "imm
igrati. They, for the most part, are not entitled to vote. They have only the right anonymous to die on construction sites and not delegate it on to others. The "low end" of the Italians now costutita distinct from young men in suits that typically spend the 800 € of their salaries by call center operators or promoters of contracts in nightclubs and designer clothes. Or are students who work hard left and right to finish his studies and food a "brain drain" inevitable . Or are workers with a head full of Big Brother and the dream of becoming football players and tronista (roll over 'a PEL of pussy ...). Everything else, white flies. In short, someone who kept the country there should be. Someone to protest in the streets, some in universities, offices that work in factories that survive. All other vote Northern League and make it a Catholic country, peace and solidarity, even a little rimbecillito which Italy, a country still rimbecillito, bigoted and derided by the international press, but also racist, xenophobic and inconsistent.
Vi lascio questa modesta e personale analisi, ora i commenti sono aperti. Cosa ne pensate ?
0 comments:
Post a Comment